<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DearEditor.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deareditor.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deareditor.com</link>
	<description>writers&#039; advice weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 15:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>re: Which POV Is Best for Fiction Starring Talking Animals?</title>
		<link>http://deareditor.com/2012/05/09/re-which-pov-is-best-for-fiction-starring-talking-animals/</link>
		<comments>http://deareditor.com/2012/05/09/re-which-pov-is-best-for-fiction-starring-talking-animals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Point of View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Halverson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point of view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing advice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deareditor.com/?p=3899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Editor…</strong></p>
<p>Main charac &#38; plot w/talking animals. Secondary: humans. 1st or 3rd ltd?</p>
<p>Trudy</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Trudy…</strong></p>
<p>You’re feeling to the point today, aren’t you? Well I’m feeling in the mood to fill in the blanks. The way I figure it, you’re asking which point of view is the better choice for a piece of fiction starring talking animals. Third person POV is probably more common for novels with animal protagonists, but that didn’t stop Elise Broach from choosing first person for <em>Masterpiece</em>, her lovely novel about a beetle who creates fine art. Compare that with <em>Charlotte’s Web</em>, wherein E. B. White used third person to legendary success. Ultimately, your story and style can’t be dictated by others’ choices, so you need to sort out which feels most natural for you to write and which offers you the most promising storytelling options. That calls for experimenting. Write one chapter in third person, then rewrite it in first. If you don’t feel an immediate affinity for one choice, keep writing chapters in both POVs until you find that you look forward to working on one more than the other.</p>
<p>Happy writing!<br />
The Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deareditor.com/2012/05/09/re-which-pov-is-best-for-fiction-starring-talking-animals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>re: How to Submit When Illustrations Are Kit-and-Caboodle with the Text</title>
		<link>http://deareditor.com/2012/05/07/re-how-to-submit-when-illustrations-are-kit-and-caboodle-with-the-text/</link>
		<comments>http://deareditor.com/2012/05/07/re-how-to-submit-when-illustrations-are-kit-and-caboodle-with-the-text/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Picture Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Halverson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[picture book illustrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deareditor.com/?p=3911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Editor…</strong></p>
<p>My wife and I have collaborated on a 4,000-word children’s book with hybrid animals as the main characters and are growing a brand built around them. Although we have not done the illustrations, we own the copyrights to them and need them to be depicted as conceived. In a query letter to an editor and/or agent, would it be appropriate to include these illustrations and would color be acceptable? As an alternative, could we insert a link to our website?</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Nick</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Nick…</strong></p>
<p>My usual reaction to this kind of question is to run around in circles with my arms flailing wildly, screaming, “Don’t include illustrations! Editors and agents really, really, REALLY don’t want them!” And in most cases, they don’t <em>need</em> them. We writers sometimes forget that half of a picture book editor’s job is envisioning potential illustration styles for a story and then pairing the manuscript with an established illustrator. But in your case, the project is all-or-nothing, so here’s how to do it right: Include one or two color illustrations on a single sheet of paper in your submission package and then refer the agent/editor to your website for more illustration samples. Explain the scope of your project in the cover letter. After that, it’s up to them to decide if they like your text and illustrations with equal passion.</p>
<p>Happy writing!<br />
The Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deareditor.com/2012/05/07/re-how-to-submit-when-illustrations-are-kit-and-caboodle-with-the-text/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>re: Disguising the F-Word in YA Fiction</title>
		<link>http://deareditor.com/2012/05/02/re-disguising-the-f-word-in-ya-fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://deareditor.com/2012/05/02/re-disguising-the-f-word-in-ya-fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teen/Middle Grade Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cursing in YA fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Halverson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deareditor.com/?p=3919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Editor…</strong></p>
<p>I'm writing a book featuring a 13-year-old main character that has a lot of cursing. It's completely integral to the story and the character's arc, and she really can't be older because of her maturity level. I have no issues with using abbreviations (e.g. f-ing, effing, etc.) so that the book can reach a wider audience, but I doubt I should do that in ms form. What do you think?</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Karol</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Karol…</strong></p>
<p>Do in the manuscript as you intend to do in the final book. Your agent/editor needs to know exactly what you’ve got in mind in order to weigh the pros and cons with you in a useful way. And you <em>will</em> have that talk. Cursing may be absolutely right for your story, but it will also absolutely alienate some readers, so that discussion will be a part of the acquisition process. Using abbreviations is an option, but it won’t likely win you a wider audience because the people who would object to the real F-word will know it when they see it written as “effing”—and it’ll still rub them the wrong way. And then there’s the awkwardness factor. “F-ing” and “effing” can sound silly in a scene that shows a character mad or coarse enough to curse, which undercuts the effect of the swearing. If your character has to cuss, then let her cuss. Agents and editors know that some projects are edgier than others, and they take that into account when evaluating the cuss factor.</p>
<p>Happy writing!<br />
The Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deareditor.com/2012/05/02/re-disguising-the-f-word-in-ya-fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>re: Writing Height in Dialogue</title>
		<link>http://deareditor.com/2012/04/30/re-writing-height-in-dialogue/</link>
		<comments>http://deareditor.com/2012/04/30/re-writing-height-in-dialogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Formatting/Punctuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Halverson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[height in fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing advice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deareditor.com/?p=3894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Editor…</strong></p>
<p>How should we write height in a story when the height is either in dialogue or a thought? Verbally we often say someone is five four, leaving out the word foot, but should it be written correctly either as five-foot-four or 5'4"?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Sue</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Sue…</strong></p>
<p>People speak in words rather than numerals. That’s why you wouldn’t type, “Dude, I called you 2 times!” into your fictional dialogue. Same thing goes for typing a measurement into dialogue. The height measurement in your example should be spelled out in this manner: “five-feet-four.” For a character with a more casual speaking style, &#8220;five-foot-four&#8221; or “five-four” will do the job nicely. Since internal thoughts are essentially unspoken dialogue, they get the spell-out treatment, too.</p>
<p>Happy writing!<br />
The Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deareditor.com/2012/04/30/re-writing-height-in-dialogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>re: Life after an Editor Calls You an Idiot</title>
		<link>http://deareditor.com/2012/04/23/re-life-after-an-editor-calls-you-an-idiot/</link>
		<comments>http://deareditor.com/2012/04/23/re-life-after-an-editor-calls-you-an-idiot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DearEditor.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Halverson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deareditor.com/?p=3884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Editor…</strong></p>
<p><a title="Writers Digest interview with Daniel H. Wilson" href="http://www.writersdigest.com/editor-blogs/guide-to-literary-agents/author-interview-daniel-h-wilson-author-of-robopocalypse" target="_blank">Writers Digest </a>asked <em><a title="Robopocalypse by Daniel H. Wilson on Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Robopocalypse-Novel-Daniel-H-Wilson/dp/0385533853" target="_blank">Robopaclypse</a> </em>author Daniel H. Wilson how he got his agent. His answer? “I wrote a query letter to an editor — a friend of a friend. The editor called me an idiot, told me never to contact an editor directly, and then recommended three literary agents he had worked with before. Laurie Fox was one of them, and I’ve never looked back.” So, do NOT contact an editor directly nowadays?</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Kate</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Kate…</strong></p>
<p>Gads. I hope Mr. Wilson was summarizing the sentiment of the letter, not quoting it. It’s hard to imagine an editor using such unprofessional verbiage with a writer. Kudos to Mr. Wilson for sticking it out and landing his agent&#8230; and <a title="Cinemablend &quot;Steven Spielberg's Robopocalypse Gets a 2013 Release Date&quot;" href="http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Steven-Spielberg-s-Robopocalypse-Gets-A-2013-Release-Date-26641.html" target="_blank">a movie deal with Steven Spielberg (2013)</a>! There&#8217;s sweet revenge, eh? Wilson&#8217;s was a “referral” submission and is quite common. As it should be—that’s called networking. Editors learn early in their careers how to respond to all kinds of referrals and rarely include accusations of idiocy. The best way to go about a referral is to have your friend contact the editor personally and ask if and how the submission could be made. This gives an editor who isn’t open to such submissions a chance to decline and provide agent names or submission hints, keeping everyone’s dignity intact.</p>
<p>Happy writing!<br />
The Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deareditor.com/2012/04/23/re-life-after-an-editor-calls-you-an-idiot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

